James Wan did not direct this film and it shows. He has proven to be a talented horror director, starting 3 series that are still going today (the other 2 being Saw and Insidious). While the 1st Insidious film had moments that were over the top, in the hands of a lesser director, that film could've fallen apart easily so many times, but Wan had a way to not let the wilder aspects of that story get away, resulting in a consistently effective flick.
The other thing that doesn't work is the moments of humor, that simply come off as forced and take you out of the film. The character of Frenchie was actually one of the biggest problems, his comedy relief moments came off as forced and silly. There were also aspects of the story that could've been explored further, such as Father Burke and Sister Irene's past (he's haunted by a failed exorcism of a young boy, she had visions as a child). These ideas are presented in a bland and simple fashion, where they could've utilized these ideas to really build more moments of dread. And finally, the character of the Nun, the demon Valak, doesn't really get a lot of screen time. When she does show up she's just there, not really creepy or menacing like she was in Conjuring 2.
With the news that James Wan will NOT be directing the 3rd Conjuring film, I'm starting to get nervous that it might end up tanking. Yes, this film is currently making money at the box office, but it's just not a very good film. I imagine that years later, when people reminisce about the Conjurverse, this film will not instantly come to mind as being memorable. I was unimpressed and felt that Valak deserved a better movie. Maybe the proposed sequel will get it right like Annabelle's did.
Comments
Post a Comment